This Week in Labor Law: OFCCP Thresholds, EEOC Guidance, and New FMLA Developments
Andy Scheu • December 4, 2025

What's New?

OFCCP Updates Contract Thresholds for Federal Affirmative Action Requirements


Recent regulatory updates mean federal contractors should carefully review whether their current agreements trigger affirmative action obligations for individuals with disabilities and protected veterans.


Federal contractors must maintain formal affirmative action programs depending on the dollar value of the contracts they hold. Under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, any employer with a federal contract of $50,000 or more is required to maintain a written affirmative action program for individuals with disabilities.


For veterans, the requirements fall under the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA). Beginning October 1, 2025, VEVRAA will apply only to federal contracts exceeding $200,000. Covered contractors must maintain a formal affirmative action program for protected veterans and continue to file annual VETS-4212 Reports.


It is also important to note that the revocation of Executive Order 11246 does not eliminate affirmative action requirements for individuals with disabilities or for protected veterans. Obligations under Section 503 and VEVRAA remain fully intact.


EEOC Releases Updated Guidance on National Origin Discrimination


The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued an updated, concise “technical assistance” document aimed at helping employers understand what constitutes national origin discrimination.


The EEOC defines national origin discrimination as treating individuals unfavorably or favorably because they are from a particular country or region, because of their ethnicity or accent, or because they appear to be of a particular ethnic background. The guidance provides several real-world examples that may lead to unlawful discrimination, including job postings that imply a preference for applicants from certain countries or with specific visa statuses, and disparate treatment in hiring or firing practices—such as holding U.S. workers to stricter application requirements than H-1B visa holders.


The EEOC also emphasizes that certain employer considerations do not justify preferring foreign workers over American workers. These include customer preference, perceived lower labor costs, or assumptions that individuals of one national origin possess stronger work ethics or higher productivity.


Court Revives FMLA Interference Claim for Employee Seeking Leave Related to Spouse’s Pregnancy


A recent case highlights the importance of properly advising workers of their rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).


A freight handler for FedEx Freight, Inc. requested information about taking FMLA leave related to his wife’s pregnancy. Later, when he informed a manager that he needed to leave work due to pregnancy-related health complications, he was terminated for alleged job abandonment. While the court found insufficient evidence to support claims of ADA associational discrimination or FMLA retaliation, it determined that a jury could reasonably conclude that FedEx failed to notify the employee of his FMLA rights.


The ruling suggests the employee may not have been terminated for refusing overtime had he been properly informed of his right to intermittent FMLA leave during the pregnancy. This case underscores the need for employers to clearly communicate FMLA eligibility and ensure frontline managers are trained to recognize qualifying situations.


Time & Pay’s Perspective


Compliance updates like these evolve quickly—and failing to follow changing rules can lead to unnecessary risk. Time & Pay partners with SESCO HR to help employers stay informed and compliant with federal regulations so they can protect their business, support their workforce, and focus on growth. If you have questions about FMLA compliance, affirmative action requirements, or any other HR or payroll challenge, the professionals at SESCO HR are here to help!



Contact Us

By Andy Scheu May 14, 2026
Tennessee employers should prepare for new noncompete restrictions taking effect July 1, 2026. Learn what the law means for your business and employment agreements.
By Andy Scheu May 7, 2026
Learn how new paid leave laws, AI employment regulations, and multi-state HR compliance trends are impacting employers in 2026 — and what businesses should do now to stay prepared.
Payroll & HR updates graphic with people reviewing documents. Includes a graph, coins, scales, books, and a gavel.
By Andy Scheu January 28, 2026
Key Employment & Payroll Updates Employers Should Know – January 2026 Staying compliant as an employer means keeping up with changes that affect wages, workplace policies, and employee leave. As we head into 2026, several federal updates are worth your attention—particularly around earnings trends, harassment guidance, and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) administration. Here’s a breakdown of what changed and what it means for employers. Real Average Hourly Earnings Remained Flat in December 2025 According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics , real average hourly earnings for all U.S. employees were unchanged from November to December 2025. While average hourly earnings increased by 0.3 percent during the month, that increase was offset by a matching 0.3 percent rise in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In other words, workers saw nominal wage growth, but inflation absorbed those gains. Looking year over year, real average hourly earnings rose 1.1 percent from December 2024 to December 2025. Why this matters for employers: Flat real wage growth can influence employee sentiment, retention, and compensation planning. Even when wages increase on paper, employees may not feel the benefit if inflation keeps pace. Employers evaluating pay strategies in 2026 should factor in cost-of-living pressures alongside competitive wage benchmarking. EEOC Rescinds 2024 Harassment Guidance on Gender Identity The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has voted to rescind its 2024 Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace. That guidance relied heavily on the Bostock v. Clayton County decision, which held that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The rescinded guidance included examples such as the intentional misuse of pronouns or denying access to bathrooms consistent with an individual’s gender identity. The revocation follows a 2025 federal court ruling in Texas that struck down the guidance. Why this matters for employers: While the specific EEOC guidance has been withdrawn, the underlying Supreme Court precedent has not changed. Employers should avoid assuming this revocation eliminates risk. Title VII protections still apply, and workplace harassment claims may still be evaluated under existing federal law, state law, and company policy. This is a good time to review harassment policies and training materials with legal counsel. DOL Clarifies How Travel Time Applies Under FMLA The U.S. Department of Labor , through its Wage and Hour Division, has issued a new Opinion Letter clarifying how travel time can count toward an employee’s FMLA entitlement. The guidance confirms that time spent traveling to and from medical appointments may be counted as FMLA leave when the travel is related to receiving care for a serious health condition. Importantly, healthcare providers are not required to estimate or certify travel time. The DOL provided several practical examples: • Travel time to and from a dialysis appointment, along with treatment time that overlaps with scheduled work hours, is FMLA-protected. • When an employee transports a parent to medical appointments for a serious health condition, all time spent traveling, waiting, attending the appointment, and returning to work may be counted as FMLA leave—even if the appointment itself is brief. • Leave taken for activities unrelated to medical care, such as accompanying a child on a school field trip, is not FMLA-protected—even if the child has a serious health condition. • Only the portion of leave related to medical care and necessary travel is protected; unrelated personal errands cannot be counted against FMLA entitlement. Why this matters for employers: This clarification reinforces the need for accurate FMLA tracking. Employers should ensure supervisors and HR teams understand that intermittent leave may include more than just appointment time. Clear policies and consistent documentation practices can help prevent miscounts, disputes, and compliance issues. Final Takeaway for Employers These updates highlight a common theme: compliance is rarely static. Wage trends affect workforce expectations, court decisions influence policy enforcement, and regulatory guidance continues to evolve.  Employers should consider reviewing: • Compensation strategies for 2026 • Harassment policies and training materials • FMLA tracking and leave administration procedures Staying proactive reduces risk—and helps build trust with employees in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Sources & Reference URLs • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Real Earnings News Release https://www.bls.gov/news.release/realer.htm • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – Enforcement Guidance Updates https://www.eeoc.gov • Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) – Supreme Court Decision https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf • U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division Opinion Letters https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/opinion-letters • Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Overview https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fmla